87th Session Recap
-
Texas’ 87th Legislative Session came to a close on Monday, May 31, after more than four months, with state lawmakers passing at least 116 new laws that directly impact Texas public schools. There were 953 bills filed (13 percent of the 7,148 filed, overall) that directly related to public education, meaning that 12 percent of proposed legislation regarding public education passed.
The session was heavily impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, from limits on who could attend legislative chambers and hearings to how the state would respond to school funding needs and loss of instruction from school closures in spring 2020. There was also considerable discussion about the distribution of federal COVID-19 relief funds. Other issues receiving significant attention and impacting public education included the expansion of authority to the Commissioner of Education; efforts to define what can be taught in social studies and civics classrooms, especially related to race and race relations; and requiring that students only participate in gender-specific UIL activities for the gender by which they were defined at birth.
In the months leading up to the session, a group of Keller ISD stakeholders helped draft a set of legislative priorities that were unanimously approved by the KISD Board of Trustees on December 14. While not all of the District's priorities were addressed, many of them were reflected in drafted legislation, and a few of them were adopted into law. Of note, Senate Bill 1, the state’s budget bill, maintained funding that the legislature put in place during the 86th legislative session, and bills were passed to expand and make permanent individual graduation committees (IGCs). Meanwhile, legislators fell just short of passing legislation that would provide approval and funding for the expansion of full-time remote instructional offerings.
The following are just a few of the key pieces of legislation that impact Texas public schools:
-
SB 1 (Nelson/Bonnen): The State Budget
Legislators’ main responsibility each biennium is to pass the state’s budget for the following two years. This session, lawmakers agreed to a $248.6 billion budget, which represents a 5.2 percent decrease over the previous biennium. General Revenue was budgeted at $116.3 billion, a 5.5 increase from the previous budget, and $46.5 of state funds were budgeted for public education, a 4.5 increase.
The budget maintains funding granted by the previous session’s HB 3, with the basic allotment remaining at $6,160 per student, the transportation allotment at $1 per mile, and the safety allotment at $9.72 per student. However, the budget does fund enrollment growth. It appropriates $30 million annually for supplemental special education services and instructional materials, but also reduced funding for the New Instructional Facilities Allotment (NIFA) by the same amount ($30 million annually).
-
SB 1267 (West/Lozano): Professional Development
Streamlines training and continuing education requirements for school employees, creating more opportunities for educators to select training that is more meaningful to their particular roles. It eliminates many training requirements, instead giving districts the ability to select what the type and frequency of training that best suit its employees.
-
SB 1365 (Bettencourt/Huberty): Commissioner Authority & Accountability
In order to address recent court decisions that prevented the Commissioner of Education’s ability to intervene for school districts with low-performing campuses, SB 1365 provides clarifications when it comes to the state’s accountability system. Most notably, D accountability ratings will be reported as “Needs Improvement,” with three consecutive such ratings triggering the same sections as a campus with an F rating. It also provides procedures to ensure fairness for districts during TEA investigations, including holding full hearings for TEA sanctions. District will also be allowed to know the identity of TEA witnesses with access to all evidence, and have authority to appeal commissioner decisions. For 2020-21, campuses that were previously rated D or F are subject to optional performance reviews; and for 2021-22, campuses will receive ratings of A, B, C, or Not Rated, while schools attempt to recover from the pandemic’s interruptions.
-
SB 1697 (Paxton/King, K.): Parent Choice for Retention
In light of learning loss due to the COVID-19 pandemic, parents or guardians may elect for their student to repeat a grade or course for the 2021-22 school year. For grades PreK-8, a parent/guardian may elect for a student to repeat the grade from the previous school year, or enter Pre-K or Kindergarten for the first time if the student would have been eligible for one of those respective grades prior to 2020-21 and elected not to attend. For high school, a parent/guardian may elect for a student to repeat any course in which the student was enrolled the previous school year, but does not apply if a student met all requirements for graduation. Provisions for repeating grades 4-8 or retaking high school courses expire September 1, 2022.
-
SB 2081 (Menendez/Talarico): Class Size Limits for Pre-K
Districts will be required to limit Pre-Kindergarten class sizes to 22 students beginning with the 2021-22 school year.
-
HB 547 (Frank/Paxton): UIL Participation for Home-Schooled Students
School districts may allow home-schooled students to participate in UIL activities and the UIL may not prohibit such participation. Such students must still demonstrate grade-level academic proficiency on national standardized tests.
-
HB 999 (Bernal/Menendez) and HB 1603 (Huberty/Selinger): Individual Graduation Committees
HB 999 allows special individual graduation committees (IGCs) to determine that a student is qualified to graduate without considering performance on end-of-course exams if the student is a senior during the 2020-21 school year. Meanwhile, HB 1603 extends IGCs and makes them permanent in law as an alternative to high school graduation requirements for students who have failed to pass all of their five required EOC exams.
-
HB 1525 (Huberty/Taylor): House Bill 3 (2019) Clean-Up Bill
HB 3, passed during the 86th legislative session, represented a massive overhaul of Texas school financing. With HB 1525, legislators attempted to address issues that have developed over the past two years and clarify any ambiguities. It was a dense bill that addressed a number of topics, including funding to address learning loss because of the COVID-19 pandemic. For that, an allotment was created for the next two school years to distribute federal relief funds. It also requires districts maintain salary increases that were provided before the pandemic. The bill included new requirements about access to School Health Advisory Councils and requirements for issuing notice and gathering consent regarding human sexuality instruction. Another inclusion requires that school districts accept donations from PTAs to fund supplemental educational staff positions at the school for which the donation was made.
-
HB 3261 (Huberty/Taylor): Electronic Administration of Assessments
Beginning with the 2022-23 school year, assessment instruments are required to be administered electronically, unless otherwise provided by a rule from the Commissioner of Education. Funds from the Instructional Materials and Technology Allotment are now allowed to be used to purchase the services, equipment, and technology infrastructure to ensure internet connectivity and adequate bandwidth, as well as pay for training employees in the electronic administration of assessments. The Commissioner must assess school technology needs and provide a cost estimate to the State Board of Education.
-
HB 3643 (King, K./Taylor): Texas Commission on Virtual Education
Whlie lawmakers did not pass any new legislation that would fund the extension of delivering education remotely, the Texas Commission on Virtual Education will be created to study and develop recommendations on the delivery of virtual education under the Foundation School Program. The Commission is modeled after the Texas Commission on Public School Finance, and is tasked with delivering a report to the 88th Texas Legislature in 2023.
-
HB 3979 (Toth/Creighton): Social Studies Curriculum & Professional Development
Though it became known colloquially and in the media as the “Anti-Critical Race Theory Bill,” the legislation makes no direct mention of the academic study. HB 3979 does prohibit teachers from being compelled to discuss a particular currency event or widely debated and currently controversial issue of public policy or social affairs, and requires that teachers choosing to discuss such a topic do so without giving deference to any one perspective. Among other provisions, schools and teachers are prohibited from requiring or awarding credit for a student’s political activism or involvement in an internship, practicum, or activity involving social or public policy advocacy. Schools are also prohibited from requiring employees to participate in training or accept funding from organizations that promote any form of race or sex stereotyping or blame on the basis of race or sex.
-
HB 4509 (Bonnen/Taylor): Civics Curriculum
The State Board of Education is required to adopt TEKS that develop students’ civic knowledge, including the foundations of the American experiment in self-government, the history and traditions of civics in the U.S.; the structure, function and processing of government institutions at the federal, state, adn local levels; and an understanding of the Founding documents of the U.S.
-
HB 4545 (Dutton/Taylor): Accelerated Instruction
Effective beginning with the 2021-22 school year, the bill eliminates the requirement that a student pass the third, fifth, or eighth-grade assessments to be promoted to the next grade. Schools must establish accelerated learning committees for each student who did not perform satisfactorily on one of those grade level math or reading exams, rather than forming grade placement committees. However, schools are prohibited from pulling students from recess to participate in accelerated instruction. The following year, such students must also be placed with a Master, Exemplary, or Recognized-certified teacher, and in some instances, parents will have the ability to choose the student’s teacher the following year.